Using low/mid range visualisers for chemistry demos and why homemade might be best.

I’ve had a visualiser for a while now after I saw them in everyday use in Chinese schools.  Mine is an Avermedia CP130 visualiser which I generally use connected to a PC (greater resolution/ability to capture video/images).  I’ve used it to project up examples of student work for which it works very well.  It works well with printed images/flashcards and I’ve always been pleased with the results.

My KS4 students have been looking at trends in the periodic table.  I thought that a visualiser would be perfect for showing the reactions of the alkali metals, and for recording them to show absent students.  I tried to get the camera head into a suitable position but where it wouldn’t be at risk of jumping potassium which was easier said than done (I didn’t want to risk damaging it).  Let’s say I wasn’t very impressed.

This is typical of the still images I collected

2011-Jan-17_Mon_10-09-39a

This is typical of the video I recorded (I’ve removed the sound since it was captured using the microphone on my laptop and wasn’t much use).

I wasn’t impressed with the quality of the recorded video, and having the flexible neck on the camera didn’t allow the range of usable viewing angles that you would imagine.  My advice?  I’ve seen fellow bloggers talk about building a low cost visualiser (e.g. GlenGilchrist).  My advice is build your own – the quality of video from a home built visualiser will at worse be equal to the quality of the video I captured and would likely be much better.  As well as saving money you are more likely to be adventurous with a camera costing under £50.

BTW I’ll stick to recording my demonstrations with my Flipcam and mini-tripod!

Using PowerPoint with students who have special needs (PowerPoint is not just for presentations!)

We’ve all seen PowerPoint used where students are asked to prepare a presentation on a topic.  More often than not this turns into a cut-and-paste-athon and students can’t always be said to be engaging with the content of the lesson.  There is also the time one spends playing with the fonts and animations (and I’ve seen adults guilty of some pretty bad presentations on this score too!).

I looked for some other ways that PowerPoint (and possibly its Open Office equivalent Impress) could be used as a teaching tool with students who have special needs or perform below national expectations.

Sequencing

Give students a presentation in which the slides are in the wrong order.  Tell them to put the steps in the right order and then give a presentation based on the new order.  It is a good idea to use pictures/slides in which the order is ambiguous or where there could be more than one correct answer.  For extremely weak students this could involve sequencing photographs from a previous lesson e.g. ones taken during an experiment.

Example: Year 7 students (Wikid Science – Forensics) are asked to solve the mystery and explain how the forensic investigator came to be in hospital covered in burns.  Students have to solve the mystery and put the slides in the right order.  They then present their ideas to the group where they receive peer assessment/feedback.

powerpoint1

Audio (or video) annotation

Give students a presentation with information to be interpreted on each slide.  Pupils must record an audio or video clip for each slide with an explanation.  Play back to group, possibly with some peer assessment.  Can also be exported as a video clip.

Example: Year 7 students (Wikid Science – Extinction) are asked to interpret the graphs and say what they mean.

Completing presentations

Using a partially completed presentation you would ask students to complete it.  This could include adding suitable graphics to text already created (or vice versa) or adding existing information to a scaffold.

Example: In this writing frame I would ask students to add information to each slide from planning through to conclusions and present it.  Students can add extra information and peer assessment information about the content.  To differentiate the activity, add more detail to the scaffold (e.g. sub-steps).  Students then present to another group or the whole class.

powerpoint2

Story telling

Ask students to prepare the narration and present to a pre-created presentation.  This is similar to adding narration but is simpler to organise and doesn’t require microphones.

Example: In this presentation on the water cycle (from the TES resources site) students have to explain what is happening and present to another group of pupils (or the whole group depending on numbers)

powerpoint4

Multiple choice questions

Just as it sounds – using a presentation with a quiz, let pupils answer the questions individually at computers, or on the IWB in a group.  If you search Google you can find pre-created templates, or you could make your own.

Example: Multiple choice quiz on plant classification.  Plays a different sound for right and wrong answers.

powerpoint3

I hope you found some of these ideas useful.  Please leave a comment below (or via the contact me form at the top of the page) if you did, or if you have any questions.

Avermedia CP130 Visualiser – First Impressions

I bought an Avermedia CP130 visualiser to use in my science lessons, hoping it would extend the range of activities that I use the whiteboard for.  I already have digital camera, microscope and flip video so this seemed like a logical extension.

 

My first impression when I unboxed the camera was the wobbliness of the neck.  Like a big black rubbery swan, the visualiser sat on my desk with curved neck, but fortunately a smaller footprint than a real swan!  When in use there was some wobble of the image when I knocked the desk, but this was only minor – however I’d recommend seating the visualiser on a firm surface.

 

100_1957

The visualiser comes with manuals, a selection of cables, a mains adaptor (on a cable of reasonable length) and a CD containing software for PC and Mac.   Installation of the software was relatively straight forward on stand-alone laptops but our technician ran into problems when installing on our networked desktops (hopefully he’ll have success on the later version that we downloaded from Avermedia’s support site).

 

The software was quite straight forward, with the ability to operate the main features of the visualiser from both the software and the unit itself.  Pupils were impressed by the ability to switch between colour and black & white (handy for looking at monochrome text) although the negative mode freaked them out a little!  Capturing a still image from the camera takes only a mouse click, although saving them is much less intuitive (or perhaps I was limited by the resolution of my desktop – the control panel of the software starts up by default off the edge of the screen).  Video recording/time lapse is supported, as are basic annotation functions, mimicking some of the simpler functions of an IWB.  An interesting feature is the ability to broadcast the image over the network, for other PCs (with the software installed) to receive.  Whilst this sounds useful, there was significant lag between images being put under the camera, the screen updating and then networked satellite PCs being updated making it less useful than first impressions would suggest.

 

2009-Jun-10_Wed_15-09-45 2009-Jun-10_Wed_14-31-17 2009-Jun-10_Wed_15-12-01 As you can see the images were crisp. quality good and the colours well balanced when viewing on the PC screen.  The image updated quickly on screen and zooms were good, although the software was unable to save a zoomed image, instead it reverted back to the full image.  Capturing the windows worked well, although it is possible that future versions of the software will make this process easier.

 

pict1

I didn’t use the VGA pass though cables supplied, which are more suited to the visualiser used as part of a permanent installation.  Instead I connected it up using the composite output (phono plug).  It took me a while to locate the tiny RGB/TV switch which needed to the flicked, but then the image appeared a glorious 72” wide.  It soon became apparent that the quality of the picture through the composite output was not as good as that captured at full resolution over USB.  Whilst this is probably due to the limitation of the composite video format, it is worth bearing in mind as connection to a PC gives a crisper picture with much brighter clearer colours.  Hopefully the picture below gives you a better idea of how the image differs from the composite output.

10062009329

I haven’t had much of a chance to use the visualiser yet.  The software isn’t installed on my whiteboard PC, limiting me to using the composite video output.  When I tried the hardware out with my year 11 class it was very useful being able to project a worksheet on screen (I hadn’t got a digital copy of the one I was using) and then being able to show the pupils’ work on the screen was a huge motivator.  (With the software installed I would have been able to easily highlight the flaw in the plug wiring above, which is not as obvious in the bottom picture).

 

I look forward to using the Avermedia visualiser more in future as I become more accustomed to the hardware. 

Have you got a visualiser?  How do you use yours in lesson?  Do you have any ideas how I could use mine better?

Feel free to post comments and suggestions below.

Promethean Interactive Whiteboard

I had a Promethean Interactive Whiteboard fitted to my classroom over the holidays (on Valentine’s day actually!) and I have to say I’m loving it already. The photo shows my whiteboard showing Freeview – handy at breaktimes! I did have an ancient Cleverboard which had stopped working reliably years ago – and the governors approved a new board when my projector died as well. My old cleverboard was basic (6 years old-ish and based on outdated Mimio technology. It didn’t come with any software and functioned as a glorified mouse – not a great teaching and learning tool (and the pupils couldn’t work it properly either).

The Activestudio software that comes with the PC is extremely powerful and a huge leap forward on what I had before. Although I’m only just starting to become familiar with the software, the board does everything my dry-wipe whiteboard did (with bells on – like highlighting, handwriting recognition, fills) and more. I’m already starting to lift diagrams from worksheets that the pupils are working with – so that they can be highlighted and annotated on screen.

I will upload my Activestudio flipcharts as I create them and add them to my resource bank.