Writing lesson plans–do YOU have to?

Planning "Best Practices" Video for DOE

I work in a school where we don’t have to write formal lesson plans, and staff are treated as trusted professionals.  We have always written lesson observations for observed lessons, and I’ve filled in many lesson plans at other schools while doing outreach there, but planning  in my own school has been left to the discretion of the individual.  I’ve also been into other schools that are in an Ofsted category and the completion of written lesson plans is usually mandatory for those in this position (with noble intentions).  That’s not to say we don’t have detailed planning documents, but teachers are left to decide the format and content for themselves.

I was skimming through a document today from the DFE entitled “Reducing bureaucracy for schools – myths and facts” and it’s worth a read if you haven’t come across it.

Myth: A written lesson plan must be produced for every lesson.
Fact. There is no statutory obligation to produce a written lesson plan for every lesson. Ofsted inspectors do not routinely scrutinise teachers’ individual plans, although they will look at them when they are offered by teachers. Inspectors focus on the quality of the school’s planning process and link that to teaching in classrooms. Where the quality of teaching is weak, it is important that schools can provide documentary evidence to show that proper planning to address this is in place.

With more schools buying in commercial resources it seems to me more important than ever to show that the bought-in scheme has been adapted and personalised for the groups it is to be used for, but it may be that writing of individual lesson plans is not the best way to do this.

I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on lesson plans.  Do you write detailed individual lesson plans by choice?  Are you instructed to write them by your department? If you don’t write detailed lesson plans what form does your planning take? Have you come across a really good way of planning?

Image © Old Shoe Woman on Flickr

Using Facebook groups to allow parents to network with each other

Facebook

 

We had an inset day at the end of term and one of our sessions revolved around improving communication with parents.  We have a huge catchment and students can come from a huge area so parents of students in the same class could potentially live ten to fifteen miles apart.  This means that parents find it hard to speak to each other, and to support each other.  We have a parent of one of our students on staff and she raised the issue that she doesn’t know what her child does on a day to day basis at school, so some kind of feedback and class based communication would be appreciated.  We brainstormed ideas and that was as far as we got.

 

My sister had a similar issue with pupils of her primary school (although on a smaller geographic scale) and has decided to pilot using Facebook groups to allow parents to talk to each other.  When people first hear the word ‘Facebook’ in connection with education alarm bells start to sound, and people who should know better start to think that inappropriate communications will happen.  So why did she decide to let common sense prevail and go with Facebook?  First of all a significant proportion of parents are already Facebook users, they have login details and passwords already and are familiar with the system.  Having something new to learn and remember is always a barrier to adoption.  Facebook groups are separate to being friends with someone – you can’t see personal details, photos or posts from others in the same group unless you are friends with them as well.  This means that parents can talk to each other (and even selected staff from school as well) without being able to see private photos or status information.  Facebook also gives to the ability to create private groups (hidden if required) that an administrator controls who can join.  This gives control to the school (who will have a member of staff overseeing admission to the new groups) and parents who overstep the agreed boundaries/rules of the group can either have their posts deleted or can be removed (or even banned) from the group.   Parents can choose to receive email updates from the group too if required.

 

The groups aren’t up and running yet but it will be interesting to see how the groups are used (one group per class) and if the levels of parental engagement are improved.  The system also leaves plenty of room for development such as piping in RSS and Twitter feeds, so who knows what the future will bring?

 

Feel free to leave a comment if you have any questions or see any problems that we might have overlooked Smile

School colour-codes pupils by ability | Education | The Guardian. Good or bad for students?


I found this article today in the Guardian (link at bottom) and it made me think about the way we group our students.  Is streaming/setting better for students? or just easier for teachers?  As a teacher in a special school I teach mixed ability year groups (some spanning up to four National Curriculum levels).  I’m used to teaching this way and many of my teaching coping involve grouping the students by ability (either mixed or similar ability levels).  We tell students what their levels and targets are and they know how they compare to their peers.  Is what this school doing any different? Should they at least be mixing staff across their internal sub-schools?  Read the extract below and visit the full article below for the full story.  I’d be interested to hear what you think!

Students with purple ties are gifted and talented. All the children at Crown Woods college in Greenwich, south London, know that. They are taught in separate colour-coordinated buildings, play in fenced-off areas and eat lunch at separate times. At 11 years old, all pupils at the college are streamed according to ability in what the headteacher argues is the only way to survive in the brave new world of market-driven education.

Crown Woods re-opened in May this year after a £50m rebuild under the Building Schools for the Future programme. Based on a small-schools model in the US, the pupils are ranked as they leave primary school and put into one of three “mini-schools” on site. The gifted and talented go to Delamere. They have purple badges on their smart blazers. The rest go to Ashwood, which wears blue, or Sherwood, which wears red. These two schools are more mixed ability, but they are still streamed into three tiers. Each school has 450 students and functions independently. There are no shared subject departments.

via School colour-codes pupils by ability | Education | The Guardian.

The search for a suitable science exam for my SEN students

Day 23 - Exam hall

 

I teach students with special needs, many of whom have good science skills.   It was customary until recently that all students did entry level qualifications, but I decided to challenge my students more and push them into GCSE equivalent examinations.

 

First of all we tried AQA Core science (modular multiple choice), thinking that multiple choice exams would suit our students.  The literacy requirements of this course were an absolute joke and students didn’t realise their full potential because they were held back by the way the questions were phrased.  When I worked through past papers with students the structure of the questions was not at all logical and candidates frequently became confused.

 

Having worked with other schools on BTEC I decided to try level 1 BTEC (Introductory).  The first cohort through responded really well but subsequent cohorts were plagued with poor attendance (most of it genuine and for medical reasons) and late comers who had missed chunks of the course.  As we progressed through the course it became apparent that we were spending more time generating portfolio material than we were spending on the actual science teaching.  My students are unable to catch up on their own, and we have many significant holes to fill at the end of the course.  If you only had to reach 80% or so of the assessment criteria it wouldn’t be a problem, but 100% for my students is a big ask!   To add insult to injury Edexcel have changed from a pass/merit/fail system to a pass/fail system that carries an extremely low point score (and yet still has similar assessment requirements).  Needless to say we will not be following BTEC Science next year.

 

So the search is on.  I need to find a qualification that lets my students demonstrate their science skills.  It seems the government would rather test students on their retention and memory skills with the shift away from modular exams.  I’ve looked at specifications and many of the ISA’s/coursework assessments are very demanding necessitated by the fact our science exams have apparently been much too easy in the past…

 

My question to you is what qualification do you recommend for students who have special needs and poor literacy skills (their science skills far exceed their literacy skills)?  What qualifications are you planning to adopt with your SEN students this year and what is the rationale for your choice?  Any feedback appreciated.

 

Image © jackhynes on Flickr